276x Filetype PDF File size 0.51 MB Source: www.kansas4-h.org
Extension Education Theoretical Framework
With Criterion-Referenced Assessment Tools Extension Manual EM-02-2013
Introduction
A guiding principle of Extension is that our 3. Provide common ground for both
educational programming is based on the individuals and teams from multiple
use on knowledge generated through disciplines in varying positions who will
research-based, scientific inquiry. To design, test and evaluate educational
produce individual, family, business or programs and materials.
community change, use of the science of Use of Theory
change educators need to use the science
of change and of h and adult and Theory is important. It provides uniformity
organizational development and and “becomes a predictor of facts” and
empowerment. Additional bodies of “stimulates and guides scientific inquiry and
knowledge are needed so that science is analyzes and explains its findings” (Boone,
infused in content and process. Safrit, & Jones, 2002, p. 65). Application of
While adult and youth education program theories has many benefits:
planning frameworks exist, Extension does 1. Increases the likelihood that intended
not have a unified theory that incorporates outcomes will be achieved;
multiple disciplines and provides 2. Provides the rationale for how the
assessments tools to study the program is strategically structured and
effectiveness of materials and educational delivered;
delivery.
This manual was created specifically to 3. Offers the basis for assessment of the
enable Extension educators to incorporate program’s degree of success in
a theoretical framework in program design. achieving intended outcomes.
The manual can: 4. Enables program planners to combine
their experience and insight with
1. Stimulate thought and dialogue that will evidence-based explanations of
further enrich the use of the framework; behavior change;
2. Guide educators and specialists who will 5. Contains key concepts and variables
design, test and evaluate Extension that define how the concepts will be
educational programming; and measured for evaluation of a theory-
driven program;
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 1
6. Provides a rationale for what Testing Theories for “Goodness of Fit”
educational program designers do or “A useful theory makes assumptions about
did, and with what result. a behavior … problem, target population or
Finally, while theories inform practice, environment that are:
practice can also inform theory. When • Logical;
defensible assessments are done, • Consistent with everyday
Extension’s programs can inform and observations;
build new theory.
• Similar to those used in previous
Theories for Extension Education successful programs; and
• Supported by past research in the
same or related area” (1, p. 5)
As educational program planners, we need
theory to understand how to increase the
likelihood that desired outcomes will be Applying Theories to Educational
achieved. Often, no one theory is adequate Programs
to guide the creation, delivery and
measurement of educational programs. After analyzing theories for goodness of fit,
Selection of theories depends on an Extension educational program planners
assessment of the situation, identification of can use guidelines for designing
the targeted population, an understanding information dissemination and educational
of the behavior to be addressed or change programming focused on change-making.
to be made and determination of outcomes These guidelines can be used for multiple
that are strategic, measurable, achievable, media in both group and individual learning.
relevant and timely. Finally, the level of A set of guidelines is shown in Table 2.
program—individual, family or other group, Assessing New and Existing Programs,
community or policy—will guide the Curricula and Materials
appropriate programming theories. Criterion-referenced assessment tools can
For this guide, we are focused on theories be used for assessing both existing
that involve people and behavior (rather educational programs, curricula and
than communities or policies) and have materials and for developing new ones.
chosen the following individually-focused In this guide, we provide three individual but
theories: complementary tools for assessing existing
social cognitive theory, educational programs, curriculum and
stages of change or readiness, educational materials and those under
theory of planned behavior, development. Criterion-referenced
communications, assessment tools permit multiple individuals
adult or youth development, to make judgments using common criteria
empowerment, and with common definitions. All three tools are
evaluation and action research. located in the Appendices.
Each is briefly presented in Table 1. Other
theories could be analyzed and presented
using the model as an example.
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 2
Other Theories in Program Development, Delivery and Evaluation
This guide is intended to stimulate thought and dialogue and to help youth and adult education
program developers. It can be used in program development, at the end of pilot testing a
program, and during a full-scale program implementation stage. We understand that
continuous improvement may require that this guide be modified as others test our ideas and
theories.
Theoretical Frameworks
Table 1 consists of a set of eight theories chosen by the authors based on their research and
practice at the local, state, and national levels with educational programs designed to produce
behavioral change. These eight theories are a base from which to start: Other theories could
be added and used.
Each theory is presented with a list of authors, a description, suggestions for application,
comments by the developers, and questions for users. Complete citations are found in the
references section.
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 3
Table 1: Individual Level Theories Overview and Use
Theory Name Description Application Comments Questions
Social Self-efficacy is the Build confidence Ties to theory of How do we determine
Cognitive “do-ability” factor— and sense of planned behavior the self-efficacy of our
Theory the measure of the control based on and stages of targeted learners?
Bandura (5) ability to take the where the change or
desired action. consumer is at readiness. How can we build
the start of confidence,
Do-ability is affected program competence and
by perception of control into our
control. If a behavior is educational design?
complex, smaller,
Control includes easier tasks Are there complex
sufficient competence should be used to tasks that must be
and confidence to create small done to act on the
act. successes. tasks?
Self-confidence is Progress should How can we divide
key to taking action. be recognized, complex tasks into
rewarded and subtasks?
reinforced as
tasks or subtasks What kinds of
are completed. recognition, rewards
and reinforcement
can we build into the
design?
Should we include
measures of self-
efficacy in our
baseline and
outcomes
assessment?
How can we tie our
self-efficacy
components to stages
of readiness?
For more information on this and other topics visit the University of Maryland Extension website at www.extension.umd.edu 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.