289x Filetype PDF File size 0.24 MB Source: policies.education.nsw.gov.au
OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES
On Education in the
21st Century
RICHARD WATSON | LECTURER AND FUTURIST
An essay commissioned by the NSW Department of Education
ON EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Richard Watson is the author
of Digital Vs. Human (Scribe,
Melbourne, 2016). He was born in
England, but has lived in Australia
and has children brought up under
both systems.
EDUCATION: FUTURE FRONTIERS is an initiative of the
NSW Department of Education exploring the implications of
developments in AI and automation for education. As part of
the Education: Future Frontiers Occasional Paper series, the
Department has commissioned essays by distinguished authors
to stimulate debate and discussion about AI, education and 21st
century skill needs. The views expressed in these essays are solely
those of the authors.
Education: Future Frontiers | Occasional Paper Series
2
ON EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY
here’s a scene in the classic Woody Allen THE ONLY THING WE CAN
Tmovie Annie Hall where the nine-year-old SAY WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY
Alvy Singer has been taken to see his doctor ABOUT THE FUTURE IS
because he’s become depressed. His mother, who is
at her wits end, points out it’s because of something THAT IT’S UNCERTAIN. IT IS
Alvy has read in a book. Alvy explains the problem: THEREFORE SURELY OUR
“The universe is expanding, someday it will break RESPONSIBILITY... TO ENSURE
apart and that would be the end of everything.” THAT OUR CHILDREN HAVE
“He’s stopped doing his homework” his mother
adds, to which Alvy responds: “What’s the point?” A DECENT FUTURE.
This is a more imaginative version of the dog ate my
homework excuse and while it’s a little early to be getting We’ve been here before many times, of course. Machines
metaphysical one might expand Alvy’s point about there have a long and rather repetitive history of stamping out
being no point to enquire about the purpose of education human skills and while it may be true that the scale and
in an age of information on-demand, kindergarten robots the speed of change are different this time, they might
and artificial intelligence. not be.
In an era dominated by the internet, mobile devices and We would therefore do well to remember the sage
screens why would one need to physically attend school? piece of advice contained in Douglas Adam’s book, The
Surely everything you need to learn can be accessed from Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, which is “Don’t Panic!”
home? Moreover, why bother with spelling, arithmetic We repeatedly overestimate the impact of new inventions
or even languages if Google can do all this for you? In over the shorter term and while many superficial things
fact why bother learning anything at all if you can access are changing, many deeper things are not.
everything from anywhere at any time? What’s the point?
FAST FORWARD TO THE FUTURE On the other hand, the only thing we can say with
absolute certainty about the distant future is that it’s
I am aware of university students refusing to attend uncertain. It is therefore surely our responsibility as adults
lectures, because they prefer to download their lectures and educators of future generations to ensure that our
and watch them at their own convenience at 1.5 children have a decent future. We should therefore make
times speed, rewinding anything that isn’t instantly mild preparations for a number of different outcomes,
clear or understandable. But what’s the point of even especially any that currently appear unfavourable.
this if advanced machine learning and autonomous After all, if just about everything else is being digitally
systems are capable of doing almost everything humans disrupted why not education? Surely education is one of
can do at a fraction of the cost? Under the current the last bastions of the analogue and unless educators
system are we not teaching the next generation start to think about how to maximise the upsides of
to become rapidly redundant in the face of accelerating digital technologies they will rapidly fall victim to the
technological change? digital downsides.
Education: Future Frontiers | Occasional Paper Series
3
ON EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY
I’M A LITTLE RETICENT TO THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA
SUGGEST THAT EDUCATION Every time a freshly caffeine infused official is put behind
NEEDS TO BE REINVENTED, a desk there seem to be panicked cries to move forward
PARTLY BECAUSE MANY (or sometimes backwards) to compete with countries
ASPECTS OF THE SYSTEM towards the top the PISA global education rankings,
namely: a) Singapore b) China, c) South Korea or d)
WORK PERFECTLY WELL. Finland.
This is a little odd because a) while Singapore is good
The educational system that exists in Australia today at memorisation it has an issue with creative problem
is one largely shipped over from England in the 19th solving, b) so does China c) ditto South Korea, which by
Century when the economy was based upon agriculture, the way has a mental health epidemic largely caused by
repetitive work and skills that generally resulted in jobs the pressure of a somewhat binary examination system. d)
for life. These jobs weren’t necessarily interesting, but Finland, was a late developer educationally speaking, so
they did involve physical activity and provided identity and it’s fairly easy to dazzle from a distance and demonstrate
meaning alongside money. This system worked fairly well high gains from a relatively low base.
back then, especially when most workers didn’t have to
think for themselves. Finland also unintentionally games the PISA system
by doing well across a narrow band of conventionally
But the system arguably works less well now when academic subjects. If you measure student happiness
individuals are increasingly paid for their ideas or their in Finland, for instance, the country is at the bottom of
ability to manage or motivate others. The system the class. Youth suicide is high in Finland (as worryingly
nowadays is also one where individuals are increasingly elsewhere) and economically the country is one of the
responsible for the creation of their own lifetime weakest in Europe.
employment. Thus an appreciation of how one sells
oneself in an entrepreneurial context might be useful. PISA, like its namesake tower, looks distinctly wobbly.
I’m a little reticent to suggest that education needs to be The OECD claims that PISA tests assess whether students
reinvented, partly because many aspects of the system have acquired key knowledge and skills that are “essential
work perfectly well, and also because one of the big for full participation in modern societies.” They would
problems that education suffers from are endless attempts say this because it’s the OECD, but the tests have little
to reinvent it. You’d think that after one hundred and or no regard to cultural or regional context and, more
fifty years or more we might have learned how to teach, importantly, do not assess how individuals perform or
but apparently not. feel about themselves across the whole of their lives.
Education: Future Frontiers | Occasional Paper Series
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.