379x Filetype PDF File size 0.76 MB Source: fda.report
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Food Labeling:
Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in
Restaurants and Similar Retail Food
Establishments
Final Regulatory Impact Analysis
FDA–2011–F–0172
Office of Regulations, Policy, and Social Sciences
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
NOVEMBER 2014
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is finalizing requirements for
providing certain nutrition information for standard menu items in certain chain restaurants and
similar retail food establishments, to implement the menu labeling provisions of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Affordable Care Act). The Affordable Care Act, in
part, amended the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), among other things, to
require restaurants and similar retail food establishments (R/SRFE) that are part of a chain with
20 or more locations, doing business under the same name and offering for sale substantially the
same menu items, to provide calorie and other nutrition information for standard menu items,
including food on display and self-service food. Under provisions of the Affordable Care Act,
restaurants and similar retail food establishments not otherwise covered by the law may elect to
become subject to the Federal requirements by registering every other year with the FDA. The
analysis of benefits and costs included in this document is the basis for the summary analysis
included in the Food Labeling: Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu Items in Restaurants and
Similar Retail Food Establishments final rule [FDA-2011-F-0172].
2
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................4
A. Summary of Costs and Benefits of the Final Requirements .................................................6
Summary of Costs ................................................................................................................6
Summary of Potential Benefits ............................................................................................7
Summary of Costs and Benefits of Menu Labeling and Vending Machine Rules ..............9
B. Need for This Regulation ....................................................................................................10
C. Comments on the Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis and Our Responses ...............13
II. COSTS AND BENEFITS OF REGULATORY OPTIONS .....................................................29
A. Baseline: No New Regulatory Action .................................................................................30
B. Option 1: The Final Rule .....................................................................................................31
Estimated Costs ..................................................................................................................33
Cost of Nutrition Analysis ...........................................................................................34
Cost of Menu Replacement ..........................................................................................46
Cost of Training ...........................................................................................................53
Cost of Legal Review...................................................................................................59
Cost of Voluntary Registration (Not Quantified) ........................................................60
Cost of Voluntary Reformulation (Not Quantified).....................................................61
Total Costs for the Final Requirements .......................................................................61
Potential Benefits ...............................................................................................................62
Translating Changes in Behavior from Menu Labeling into Potential Welfare Gains 63
Welfare Estimates ........................................................................................................66
Stream of Benefits........................................................................................................76
Total Net Benefits ........................................................................................................78
Literature on the Potential Effects of Menu Labeling on Consumer Behavior ...........79
Alternative Calculation of Benefits (Not Included in Final Estimates) .......................84
Other Benefits (Not Quantified) ..................................................................................95
Uncertainty of Costs and Potential Benefits ......................................................................96
C. Option 2: Limited Scope ...................................................................................................100
Costs .................................................................................................................................100
Benefits ............................................................................................................................102
D. Option 3. Shorter Compliance Time .................................................................................103
Estimated Costs ................................................................................................................103
Potential Benefits .............................................................................................................104
III. REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS ......................................................................105
A. Introduction .......................................................................................................................105
B. Estimating the Number of Covered Small Businesses ......................................................106
C. Regulatory Options ...........................................................................................................107
D. Summary ...........................................................................................................................108
IV. UNFUNDED MANDATES ..................................................................................................109
V. APPENDIX A .........................................................................................................................111
VI. APPENDIX B ........................................................................................................................121
VII. APPENDIX C.......................................................................................................................124
VIII. REFERENCES....................................................................................................................126
3
I. INTRODUCTION
We have examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive Orders 12866 and
13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits (both quantitative and qualitative) of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. This rule is designated an
“economically” significant rule, under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
In particular, Executive Order 12866 directs each agency engaged in rulemaking to
"identify the problem that it intends to address"-- that is, the essential purpose of the rule. As a
separate step in its rulemaking, Executive Order 12866 directs the agency to "assess both the
costs and the benefits of the intended regulation ... , recognizing that some costs and benefits are
difficult to quantify." Executive Order 13563 confirms that "each agency is directed to use the
best available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible. Where appropriate and permitted by law, each agency may consider (and
discuss qualitatively) values that are difficult or impossible to quantify.” Here, the essential
purpose of the rule is to make nutrition information for certain foods available to consumers in a
direct, accessible, and consistent manner to enable consumers to make informed dietary choices.
The following analysis of anticipated and quantifiable costs and benefits from the promulgation
of the rule does not alter this fundamental purpose.
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.