166x Filetype PDF File size 0.95 MB Source: ucanr.edu
SCHOOL-BASED INTERVENTIONS FOR
PROMOTING NUTRITION AND
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & PREVENTING
OBESITY: OVERVIEW OF STUDIES
AND FINDINGS
Contributors: Kelly Blondin, Pat Crawford, Dania Orta-Aleman, Hallie Randel-Schreiber,
Ron Strochlic, Karen Webb, Gail Woodward-Lopez
Produced by the Nutrition Policy Institute for the California Department of Public Health, with funding from the
United States Department of Agriculture’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – USDA SNAP. These
institutions are equal opportunity providers and employers. For important nutrition information, visit
www.CaChampionsForChange.net.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of CDPH
or USDA.
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. iii
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
2. Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria ........................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Evidence search .................................................................................................................................. 6
2.3 Evidence synthesis and analysis .......................................................................................................... 7
3. Results ....................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.1 Numbers of studies and outcomes measured .................................................................................... 8
3.2 Effects of interventions ..................................................................................................................... 10
Group 1: PA only interventions ............................................................................................................... 12
Group 1.1: PE only interventions ........................................................................................................ 12
Group 1.2: PE plus other PA interventions (mainly PA promotion) .................................................... 13
Group 1.3: PA offered plus PA promotion .......................................................................................... 14
Group 1.4: PA promotion only ............................................................................................................ 15
Group 2: Nutrition only interventions .................................................................................................... 15
Group 2.1: School food changes only ................................................................................................. 17
Group 2.2: School food changes plus nutrition promotion ................................................................ 17
Group 2.3: Nutrition promotion only .................................................................................................. 18
Group 3: Nutrition + PA interventions .................................................................................................... 19
Group 3.1: PE and/or PA offered plus nutrition promotion and/or PA promotion ............................ 20
Group 3.2: After school PE plus school food changes ........................................................................ 21
Group 3.3: PE and/or PA offered plus school food changes plus nutrition promotion and/or PA
promotion ........................................................................................................................................... 22
Group 3.4: PA promotion plus nutrition promotion ........................................................................... 24
4. Conclusions and implications for future interventions ........................................................................... 24
Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. 28
Appendix 1: Study descriptions .................................................................................................................. 29
Appendix 2: Case examples of promising practices .................................................................................. 101
Appendix 3. PubMed Boolean operator search strategy .......................................................................... 114
Appendix 4. Selected definitions & acronyms .......................................................................................... 116
References Cited ....................................................................................................................................... 117
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
School-based interventions for children should be a focal point for community obesity
prevention efforts. Considerable evidence has been accumulating over the past two
decades, indicating that high quality comprehensive interventions conducted at school
sites can reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity, prevent weight gain and
improve child and adolescent food and Physical Activity (PA) behaviors. This review
provides an updated assessment of school-based interventions which were designed to
impact student nutrition, PA and clinical outcomes. Evidence reviews commencing in 2008
and primary studies ending in 2018 were evaluated. The findings from this review support
the use of comprehensive interventions that address physical activity (PA) and nutrition,
including school physical education (PE), school food improvements, and nutrition and PA
promotion for students and staff with curricula/classroom activities that match existing
requirements, motivate student participation, and are easy and convenient for school staff
to deliver. The findings from this review provide information that can be useful to update
and enhance SNAP-Ed efforts in schools to promote nutrition, PA and healthy weight in
childhood.
iii
1. Introduction
With one-third of children now classified as overweight or obese, the need is urgent for
1
obesity prevention interventions targeting children. The Institute of Medicine’s Committee
on Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention provided strong evidence supporting
2
schools as the focal point for preventing child obesity. Schools provide an opportune
setting to reach large numbers of children where they spend a significant proportion of
their day and where many receive the bulk of their daily food intake. Schools also provide
opportunities for students to participate in increased physicial activity (PA.).
Public health professionals and policymakers have sought methods to promote healthy
lifestyles in the school setting by improving children’s nutrition and PA. In 2016, the USDA
strengthened regulations governing foods and beverages offered to children at school
3
through the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act.
Research has informed and motivated many positive changes and continues to guide
interventions in school settings. Many strategies have been empirically evaluated and a
growing body of literature offers insights regarding promising approaches for addressing
childhood obesity.
With the intent of informing evidence-based practices for implementation through the
California SNAP-Ed program, the Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California,
Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, conducted a review of the peer reviewed
published literature on school-based strategies for nutrition and PA promotion and obesity
prevention. This report presents the findings, which will be combined with those from
future reviews to inform comprehensive SNAP-Ed programming across multiple settings. It
first outlines the methods used to conduct the review, then presents descriptive and
analytic findings, and concludes with a discussion and recommendations for California
SNAP-Ed.
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.