289x Filetype PDF File size 0.47 MB Source: fod.infobase.com
SOCIOLOGY
CRIME
AND DEVIANCE
Activities And Web Links
Crime and Deviance
Crime and Deviance
Introduction
Crime and Deviance is a major topic in Sociology but one that many students find
difficult. This is in part because of the fragmentation and diversity of the different
approaches, making it difficult for both teacher and student to establish links and
connections between them. This video attempts to address these difficulties by
developing a framework to help clarify the similarities and differences between these very
different approaches to crime and deviance.
We have also taken account of the dramatic shift in the focus of research in recent years
away from deviance and theorising about crime, towards crime control and prevention.
We look at how the field is changing and how some of the ‘newer’ approaches can be
linked to the more ‘familiar’ ones.
The structure of both the video and the booklet is based on the idea that sociological
theories of Crime and Deviance can be usefully divided into theories of:
Social Causation
Social Construction
Social Control
This division not only helps to clarify some of the diversity in the area, it also reflects
some general traditions of sociological thought, the implications of which go well beyond
crime and deviance.
This framework is also useful in adopting a chronological approach, as in the video, to
the teaching of the topic of crime and deviance. The idea here is to illustrate that theories
are influenced by cultural changes in wider society and ideas also go in and out of
fashion.
Before showing the video:
Ask your students about their own experiences of crime.
Have they or anyone they know been the victim of a crime?
Have they ever been stopped by the police for questioning?
Do they have a view about the typical criminal?
What crimes or deviant behaviour will they admit to?
www,onlineclassroom.tv Page 1
Crime and Deviance
Section 1: Origins of the Sociology of Crime and Deviance
Crime has always been with us but different historical periods have had different ways of
analysing and responding to crime. This video begins with a brief look at the origins of
th
the study of crime in the 18 Century. Although there won’t be questions on this in the
exam, it helps put the subject in its historical and social context, whilst bringing a sense
of continuity to the subject and helping place changes in focus and ‘new’ developments
into a wider context. As the video says, ideas go in and out of fashion and some of the
th
newest ideas on crime prevention are similar to ideas from the 19 Century!
In order to clarify this historical perspective for students we identify three key influences
of early sociology:
classical criminology
positivism
Durkheim.
Classical criminology
Arising out of the philosophy of the Enlightenment, classical criminology was concerned,
above all, with producing a more rational criminal justice system. It was argued that
society was a contract; crime breached that contract and was therefore, a moral and a
political issue requiring state control. However, that control should be rational and just.
For example, laws should be clear, a person must be presumed innocent until proved
guilty, criminal justice had to be consistent not arbitrary and, where possible, crime
control should be characterised more by reform than by punishment of the body.
classical criminology: key assumptions
the focus was on the criminal act
there were no essential differences between criminals and non-criminals, criminals
have free will and choose to commit crimes
punishment should fit the crime
The ideas of classical criminology underpin the criminal justice system in most western
societies and also make many of the same assumptions as recent approaches to crime
control.
www,onlineclassroom.tv Page 2
Crime and Deviance
Positivism
th
While classical criminology influenced the judicial system, by the later part of the 19
Century the new social sciences developing in universities were becoming increasingly
interested in the causes of crime. This work was underpinned by positivist ideas of the
similarities between the social and the natural sciences. Crime was a technical problem
and not a moral or political one. It was caused by some ‘defect’ and once you knew the
cause you could put it right, rather like a mechanic can repair a faulty car. Of course,
positivists differed in where they located the origins of that defect:
in biological theory, the defect was to be found in the body
in psychological theory, it was in the mind
in early social theory it was less evidence of a defective individual than a defective
environment [a longstanding theme in a variety of sociological approaches]
positivism: key assumptions
the focus was on the criminal
criminals were different from non-criminals [determinism]
punishments (treatments) should fit the offender
positivism and classical criminology: continuing issues
The differences between classical criminology and positivism are important because they
are still being played out in three longstanding debates in our thinking about crime and
deviance.
Should the focus be on the crime or the criminal?
Is crime ‘chosen’ or ‘determined’?
Should the primary focus be on the causes of crime or its control?
www,onlineclassroom.tv Page 3
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.