398x Filetype PDF File size 0.12 MB Source: www.ppup.ac.in
Course type- UG
Course- BA (Part III)
Title- Sociological Theories of Crime
Name of Teacher- Dr. Mrinal Manjari
Post- Assistant Professor
Department- Sociology
J. D. Women's College
Patliputra University
Sociological Theories of Crime
Crime and deviance is studied in sociology from the perspective of a structure and
functions of society . In sociology crime and deviance can easily be defined as any
activity that violates the established and well accepted norms and rules of society.
In other words nonconformity to establish rules in society is deviance. In sociology,
deviance or crime is not simply seen as individual behaviour but a result of social
conditioning. It is necessary to first understand the meaning of crime and deviance.
Those activities which break the law of a society and are accordingly punishable by
law are called crime. The Oxford Dictionary of Sociology defines crime as an offence
which goes beyond the personal and into the public sphere, breaking prohibitory
rules or laws, to which legitimate punishments or sanctions are attached and which
requires the intervention of a public authority. An activity as a crime may change
over time as well as across cultures. For example, drinking alcohol was not a crime
in Bihar before 2016 and now a days it is a crime. similarly alcoholism is a crime in
Bihar and Gujarat states of India but not in other states. Therefore 'what is crime?'
is very difficult to be answered.
The terms crime and deviance are different. Although Sometimes they are used
interchangeably. The term deviance Has more wide cannotation than crime. There
are many activities that do not follow the norms of society but are tolerable and no
formal punishment is given by the law. Such activities are deviant activities.
Deviant activities are relative and cannot be defined in absolute way. There are
particular standards that differ from society to society to define deviant behaviour.
For example smoking by women is deviant behaviour in Indian society but not in
western society. It is also not a crime either in India or western countries. However
all crimes are considered as deviant behaviour.
Sociological perspectives related to crime and deviance are given -
Functionalist perspective - Functionalist give Importance to shared norms and
values for establishment of order in society. Deviance is seen dysfunctional for
society because it is a threat to the order of society.
Emile Durkheim's view - He discussed crime in his book "The Rules of Sociological
Method" . For him, crime is normal aspect of society and it is functional. Crime is
inevitable in society. It becomes dysfunctional only when the rate of crime is
extremely high. It was called pathological condition. For Durkheim, when a crime is
committed the criminal is punished and this ensures the effective enforcement of
existing law. It ensures the importance of rules and laws. In the same fashion Albert
Cohen also counted several functions of deviance and crime in society.
Structural strain theory by Robert K. Merton - Merton developed his idea on crime
and deviance in his essay "social structure and anomie." He argued that deviance
is caused not by pathological personalities but by the structure and culture of the
society. According to Merton, when there is discrepancy between culturally
accepted goals and the legitimate institutional means to achieve them, then the
deviance occurs. Culturally accepted goals are rewards, objectives, ambitions of
individuals. There are institutional means to achieve them. Following Durkheim,
Merton defined anomie as a breakdown in the culture and structure. Merton
mentions five possible ways in which an individual responds to achieve goals.
Conformity - Here, a member of the society tries to achieve socially accepted goals
through legitimate institutional means. In other words we can say that he individual
totally follows the norms and values of society in all respect .
Innovation - Here, the success goal is achieved not by using legitimate institutional
means. Therefore, it turn to be devient behaviour. This mostly occurs when the
individual found it difficult to achieve goals through available legitimate means.
Ritualism - Here the success goal is abandoned and only the legitimate institutional
means are followed by individuals. This is generally with middle class people who
find no career advancement and continue following means that is their current job.
Retreatism - Retreatism is the way of response by those who, although strongly
internalized both cultural goals and legitimate institutional means even then they
do not get success. Therefore, they use to retreat by abandoning both.
Rebellion - This way is adopted by those who reject both cultural goals as well as
institutional means and replace them by creating new goals and means for
themselves. They want to create a new society of their own.
According to Merton, the deviant behaviour is a result of the response of
individuals. It depends on how individuals identify cultural goals for themselves
and institutional means to achieve goals.
Structural and subcultural theories of deviance - Structural theories are very much
similar to structural strain theory of R K Merton. They see deviant activities in the
position of individual in the social structure. sub-cultural theories explain deviance
in relation to the sub-culture of the society. According to this, a particular group in
the society develops a distinct culture of its own with values and norms different
from the mainstream society.
According to Albert Cohen, the delinquent sub-culture not only rejects the
mainstream culture but also reverses it completely. In Cohen's word, "The
delinquent sub-culture takes it's norms from the larger culture but turns them
upside down". therefore, the values like robbing, stealing, vandalism, that are
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.