251x Filetype PDF File size 1.41 MB Source: www.projektakademien.se
E-leadership for project managers:
virtual leadership and trust-building for perceived project
success
Master Thesis within Business Administration
Authors: Alfred Park & Luminita Popescu
Tutor: Ethel Brundin
Jönköping May 2014
Master Thesis 2014
Park & Popescu
Acknowledgement
With the following lines we would like to express our appreciation and gratitude to all the people
that contributed to this master thesis.
First, we want to particularly thank our advisor Prof. Ethel Brundin for her good advice, constant
insightful feedback and patience to guide us through our struggles in achieving a, hopefully
successful end. Her valuable comments made a huge difference in the overall result.
Second, we owe great thanks to Mats Ragnarsson from Wenell Management AB. This thesis
would not have been possible without his help of introducing us to the project managers
participating in our study. He also spent his valuable time in giving us suggestions and useful
insights into the topic.
Also, we thank the project leaders that found themselves available for being interviewed and
enriched our research with their generous contribution. Additionally, we thank the project team
members for participation in the survey.
To our fellow students, thank you for your time, engagement and constructive feedback during
the seminars. We wish you all a thriving future ahead!
Last but not least, we deeply thank our families and friends who encouraged and supported us
throughout the entire time of our research project.
Jönköping – May 12th, 2014
Alfred Park Luminita Popescu
E-LEADERSHIP
Master Thesis 2014
Park & Popescu
Master’s Thesis in Business Administration
Title: E-Leadership for Project Managers – Virtual Leadership and trust-building
for perceived project success
Author: Alfred Park & Luminita Popescu
Tutor: Ethel Brundin
Date: 2014 – 05 – 12
Subject terms: Virtual leadership, Challenges, Leadership behaviour, Task-oriented
leadership, Relations-oriented leadership, Shared leadership, Trust-
building, Project success, Project Management
Abstract
Background Globalisation has brought substantial changes to the global economic
landscape and has intensified organisational leadership complexity.
Therefore, the rapid global expansion and the fast-moving technology
have increased virtual collaborations and created opportunities for
organisations worldwide. Thus, many organisational projects are
characterized by a certain degree of virtuality which developed the need
for alternative leadership in a virtual context, a phenomenon more
relevant as businesses move toward more non-traditional work.
Purpose The purpose of this thesis is to explore the leadership of project managers
in a virtual setting, focusing on the challenges to virtual leadership, on
trust building, and task- and relationship-oriented leadership behaviour for
perceived project success.
Method Semi-structured interviews were used to assess leaders’ behaviour in virtual
projects, how trust was achieved and how the challenges specific to the
virtual context affected perceived project success. Questionnaires were
used as part of the triangulation technique in order to add the perspective
of team members and increase the validity of results. Therefore, a mixed-
methods design was employed.
Findings The results of this study revealed that technology affects communication
through low synchronicity and social presence; cultural differences affect
how team members perceive project goal achievement, and task-related
conflicts have a positive impact on effectiveness. Moreover, trust was
initially achieved through creating a unifying purpose for the members,
whereas along the development of a project, the influence project leaders
had on trust was often limited to the temporary nature of projects. Also,
task-related leadership behaviour increases in importance at the beginning
and end of a project and the relationship behaviour more in the middle
stages. Shared leadership was perceived as beneficial for coordination of
tasks but it did not apply to decision-making.
Conclusion E-leadership encounters challenges that increase task-related leadership
behaviours and render trust-building difficult to achieve. However, the
virtual environment creates opportunities that project managers should
seek to foster and reduce the constraints of these challenges.
E-LEADERSHIP
Master Thesis 2014
Park & Popescu
Table of Contents
Introduction .......................................................................................................1
1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Problem Statement ......................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 4
1.4 Disposition ........................................................................................................................................ 4
Frame of Reference........................................................................................... 5
2.1 Project management and virtual teams .................................................................................... 6
2.1.1 From traditional projects to virtual projects .......................................................................... 7
2.1.2 The challenges of working with virtual teams ....................................................................... 8
2.1.3 Trust-building in virtual teams ............................................................................................... 11
2.2 Virtual leadership .......................................................................................................................... 15
2.2.1 Defining E-Leadership ............................................................................................................ 15
2.2.2 Leadership behaviour in virtual teams .................................................................................. 15
2.2.3 Shared leadership ..................................................................................................................... 17
Methodology .................................................................................................... 19
3.1 Research philosophy .................................................................................................................... 20
3.2 Research approach ....................................................................................................................... 21
3.3 Methodological choice ................................................................................................................ 21
3.3.1 The nature of the research design ....................................................................................... 22
3.4 Research strategy.......................................................................................................................... 22
3.5 Time horizon ................................................................................................................................. 23
3.6 Data collection .............................................................................................................................. 23
3.6.1 Semi-structured interviews ..................................................................................................... 23
3.6.2 Questionnaire ........................................................................................................................... 25
3.7 Data analysis .................................................................................................................................. 26
3.8 Research ethics ............................................................................................................................. 27
3.9 Research limitations and reflections ....................................................................................... 28
Empirical Findings & Analysis ...................................................................... 30
4.1 Perceived project success ........................................................................................................... 31
4.2 The challenges of working with virtual teams ..................................................................... 32
4.2.1 Technology and Communication .......................................................................................... 32
4.2.2 Cultural differences .................................................................................................................. 33
4.2.3 Conflicts .................................................................................................................................... 34
E-LEADERSHIP
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.