269x Filetype PDF File size 0.52 MB Source: haydys.net
Differential Geometry I
Lecture notes
Andriy Haydys
January 17, 2022
This is a draft. If you spot a mistake, please e-mail me: andriy(DOT)haydys@ulb.be.
Contents
1 Introduction 2
2 Smoothmanifolds 4
2.1 Basic definitions and examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Smoothmaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3 Thefundamental theorem of algebra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.4 Tangent spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.5 Cut off and bump functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.6 Thedifferential of a smooth map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3 Submanifolds and partitions of unity 23
3.1 Submanifolds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.2 Immersions and embeddings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.3 Partitions of unity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4 Thetangentbundleandthegroupofdiffeomorphisms 35
4.1 Someelementsoflinear algebra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.2 Thetangent bundle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.3 Vector fields and their integral curves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.4 Flows and 1-parameter groups of diffeomorphisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
5 Differential forms and the Brouwer degree 45
5.1 Someelementsof(multi)linear algebra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
5.2 Thecotangent bundle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.3 Thebundleofp-forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
5.4 Thedifferential of a 1-form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
5.5 Orientability and integration of k-forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
5.6 Thedegree of a map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
6 Further developments 58
6.1 Thehairy ball theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
6.2 TheEuler characteristic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
6.3 Ontheclassification of manifolds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
6.4 TheGaussmap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
1
Chapter1
Introduction
Asubstantial part of mathematics is related to solving equations of various types. Given any
equation, we may try to analyze this by studying the following sequence of questions:
1. Does there exist a solution (a root)?
2. If the answertothepreviousquestionisaffirmative,howmanysolutionsdoestheequation
have?
3. If there are finitely many solutions, can we find all of them?
Forexample,thereaderlearnedatschoolthepropertiesofthequadraticequationax2+bx+
c = 0. In this case the above questions are easy to settle and the answers are well known to the
reader.
Sometimesanequationmayhaveaninfinitenumberofsolutions. Ifthereareonlycountably
manyroots, the last question from the list above still makes sense. For example, all solutions of
the equation sinx = 0 are given by a simple formula: xn = πn, n ∈ Z.
In many cases, however, equations have uncountably many solutions so that asking to find
all solutions is not really meaningful. Instead, it turns out to be more interesting to replace
Question 3 by the following one:
′
3. Whataretheproperties of the set of all solutions?
Which particular properties we are interested in may depend on the context. The property
most relevant to the content of this course is concerned with the local structure of the set of all
solutions.
Let us consider an example. The equation
x2 +x2 +x2 = 1, (1.1)
1 2 3
where x ,x ,x ∈ R, clearly has uncountably many solutions.
1 2 3
2 3 2 2 2 2
Denote S := {x = (x ,x ,x ) ∈ R | x + x + x = 1}, that is S is the set of all
1 2 3 1 2 3
solutions of (1.1). Of course, S2 is the sphere of radius 1, however let us pretend for a moment
3 2
that we do not know this. As a subset of R , S is a topological space. It turns out that this
topological space has a very particular property, which we consider in some detail next.
Thefamiliar stereographic projection from the north pole N := (0,0,1) is given by
ϕ : S2 \{N} → R2, ϕ (x) = x1 , x2 .
N N 1−x 1−x
3 3
This is in fact a homeomorphism with the inverse
−1 1 2 2 2
ϕ (y)= 2y , 2y , −1+y +y , y = (y ,y ) ∈ R . (1.2)
N 1+y2+y2 1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2
2
Differential Geometry I
Wecanalsodefineastereographic projection from the south pole S := (0,0,−1) by
ϕ : S2 \{S} → R2, ϕ (x) = x1 , x2 ,
S S 1+x 1+x
3 3
which is also a homeomorphism.
Since any point on the sphere lies either in S2 \{N} or S2 \{S} (or both), any point on the
n
sphere has a neighbourhood, which is homeomorphic to an open subset of R (of course, n = 2
2
in our particular example and the open subset is R itself). This property leads to the notion of
a manifold, which will play a cenral rôle in the course. We will see below, that this property is
k ℓ
not specific to Equation (1.1). On the contrary, for any smooth map F : R → R and almost
any c ∈ Rℓ the set of all solutions to the equation F(x) = c is a manifold. That is, there is a
huge pull of examples of manifolds and many objects of particular interest in mathematics turn
out to be manifolds.
Comingbacktoourexample,wecompute:
y y
◦ −1 1 2
ϕ ϕ (y)= , . (1.3)
S N 2 2
|y| |y|
◦ −1 2
Hence,ϕ ϕ issmoothonanopensubsetR \{0}andasimilarcomputationyieldsthatthisis
S N
◦ −1
alsotrueforϕN ϕ . Thispropertycanbeusedtostudysmoothfunctionsonthespheredirectly
S
without reference to the ambient space. More importantly, in more general situations where the
ambientEuclideanspacemaybesimplyabsent,ananalogueofthispropertyallowsonetoapply
familiar tools of analysis to functions defined on more sophisticated objects than just subsets of
an Euclidean space. In some sense, this constitutes the core of differential geometry.
Summingup,theaimofthesenotesistotransfer familiar tools of mathematical analysis to
a more geometric setting where the underlying domain of a function (map) is not just an open
subset of Rn, but rather a manifold. The benefits of doing so are ubiquitous, but explaining this
in some detail requires a bit of work. It is my hope to convey that the notion of a manifold is
useful and well worth studying further.
Draft 3 January 17, 2022
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.