287x Filetype PDF File size 0.95 MB Source: arjenwals.files.wordpress.com
Arjen E.J. Wals (Editor)
Revised open-access edition 2014
Full reference:
Wals, A.E.J., (Ed.) (1999). Environmental Education and Biodiversity. National
Reference Centre for Nature Management, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 108
p. (Revised open-access edition 2014)
National Reference Centre for Nature Management
Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management and Fisheries, IKC-report nr. 36
Wageningen 1999, ISBN 90-75789-03-3
Duplication of parts of this publication is permitted provided that proper reference
is made to the source.
Editor Arjen E.J. Wals (Environmental Education Research,
Agricultural Education Group, Department of Social Sci-
ences, Wageningen Agricultural University, the Nether-
lands)
Contributing authors Daan van Weelie (Department of Biology Education,
Centre for Science and Mathematics Education, Utrecht
University, the Netherlands)
Amos Dreyfus (Department of Agricultural Education and
Extension, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel)
Arjen E.J. Wals (Environmental Education Research
Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen Agri-
cultural University, the Netherlands)
Art Alblas (Department of Biology Education, Centre for
Science and Mathematics Education, Utrecht University,
the Netherlands)
Marjan Margadant-van Arcken (Environmental Education
Research Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wa-
geningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands)
Cover photographs Upper: Sarah Errington (Lineair b.v.)
Lower left: Friso van der Zee (National Reference Centre
for Nature Management)
Lower right: Ron Giling (Lineair b.v.)
Lay-out and printing Van Eck & Oosterink, Kesteren
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT 5
FOREWORD 7
1 INTRODUCTION 7
2 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION AS HUMAN DEVELOPMENT 11
2.1 Introduction 11
2.2 Education, not training 12
2.3 Environmental education and ideology 15
2.4 Components of high quality learning in environmental education 18
2.4.1 Process anchors 19
2.4.2 Content anchors 24
2.5 Conclusions 28
3 BIODIVERSITY AS A THEME FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 30
3.1 Introduction 30
3.2 Biodiversity as a concept for environmental education 31
3.3 Values of biodiversity 34
3.4 Science, literacy and socio-scientific disputes 36
3.5 The role of scientific knowledge in socio-scientific disputes 38
3.6 Conclusions 41
4 STEPPING STONES FOR MAKING BIODIVERSITY MEANINGFUL
THROUGH EDUCATION 43
4.1 Introduction 43
4.2 Analysing meanings 45
4.2.1 Coping with diverging meanings: a working definition of biodiversity 45
4.2.2 Biowhat? 47
4.2.3 Biodiversity? 49
4.2.4 Biotime? 52
4.3 Determining perspectives 52
4.4 Establishing learning goals 54
4.5 Developing themes 59
4.6 Contextualising biodiversity 62
4.7 Valuing biodiversity 65
4.8 Examples of using the stepping stone procedure 69
4.9 Conclusion 74
Appendix I Research approach and considerations underlying the stepping stone
procedure 76
Appendix II The Delphi questionnaires 80
Round 1 80
Round 2 88
Appendix III Bibliography 94
REFERENCES 99
ABOUT THE AUTHORS 106
3
ABSTRACT
In a research project financed by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature
Management and Fisheries, the Wageningen Agricultural University and the Utrecht
University jointly investigated the various meanings, values and uses of biodiversity
in order to tap its educational potential more fully. Based on interviews with
various experts, a literature review and a Delphi-study, a procedure was
constructed for developing the theme of biodiversity within environmental
education programmes. Despite all the confusion about biodiversity, one thing is
clear: there is no one single perspective or definition of biodiversity that
accurately describes it in all situations or contexts. Biodiversity can have different
meanings depending on the user and the context in which it is used. Even within
the scientific arena a great number of biodiversity meanings and interpretations
can be distinguished. It is not uncommon to find that scientific, political and
symbolic meanings are used interchangeably by the same person. Both the
knowledge base and the value base of biodiversity are variable and to a degree
unstable and questionable.
Although these characteristics of biodiversity can render the concept useless or
reduce it to a rhetorical instrument, they can also add to its strength when
handled with care. Certainly from an environmental education perspective, but
also from a policy-making perspective, these characteristics offer some worthwhile
advantages: 1) Biodiversity brings together different groups in society that are
searching for a common language to discuss nature conservation issues in relation
to sustainability issues. 2) This dialogue allows the socio-scientific dispute
character of “science-in-the-making” to surface. Participation in such a dispute is
an excellent opportunity to learn about a highly relevant, controversial,
emotionally charged and debatable topic at the crossroads of science, technology
and society. 3) Making such a concept meaningful to the lives of citizens requires a
procedure that could be utilised when developing educational programmes that
focus on similar topics (i.e. education for sustainability).
This book provides a justification and rationale for developing biodiversity as a
leading concept for environmental education for human development. Furthermore
it proposes a stepping stone procedure that recognises the socio-scientific dispute
character of biodiversity and provides a tool for turning biodiversity into a
meaningful and existentially relevant issue. The procedure includes the following
steps: analysing meanings of biodiversity, determining one or more perspectives
based on the general learning goals of environmental education, setting specific
learning objectives, selecting (sub)themes for learning, contextualising biodiversity
and establishing the value of biodiversity. The procedure is intended to help
curriculum developers, teachers, educational support staff and environmental
educators give specific meaning to biodiversity and to help learners critically
analyse the way biodiversity is used in science, technology and society. The
procedure is an intermediate product that offers direction in developing and
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.