292x Filetype PDF File size 0.23 MB Source: papers.iafor.org
A Critical Review of Environmental Education for Sustainable Development Goals, the
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and Child-Friendly Schools
Gulsah Dost, University of Durham, United Kingdom
The European Conference on Education 2021
Official Conference Proceedings
Abstract
Global warming and other acts of environmental destruction have had significant consequences
on our lives in recent years that will most likely continue in the future. Therefore, it is very
important for children to have access to information about environmental education and the
ability to apply this knowledge practically. Environmental education builds awareness, creates
the skills and knowledge essential to express complex environmental problems, helps students
understand how their choices and actions influence the environment and promotes ways to keep
the environment sustainable and healthy for the future. Environmental education should be
considered and not limited to schooling but added to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and Child Friendly
Schools (CFS). For this reason, this study will examine the role of environmental education
within the scope of SDGs, UNCRC and CFS, and will critically evaluate the relationship
between environmental education and each concept.
Keywords: Environmental Education, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,
Sustainable Development Goals, Child Friendly Schools
iafor
The International Academic Forum
www.iafor.org
Introduction
Environmental damage has significant impact on the lives of children today and future
generations as the severity of the damage increases in the absence of preventative action.
According to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report (IPCC, 2021),
scientists are observing changes in the Earth's climate in every region of the world and in the
entire climate system. Their findings show that there are new estimates of global warming
exceeding 1.5°C in the coming decades and up to 2°C if necessary measures are not taken.
Thus, increasing the number of environmentally literate individuals is important for the
protection of the environment and the sustainability of environmental resources (UNESCO,
1978; Wheaton, Kannan, & Ardoin, 2018), and for this purpose, environmental education can
serve as a critical tool in tackling environmental problems (e.g., Potter, 2009; Palmer, 1999).
Environmental protection is seen as an important goal at all stages of environmental education.
Michelsen and Fischer (2017) stated that environmental education should be seen as an
indispensable necessity if we want to successfully promote sustainable development.
Therefore, nature-based environmental education, which provides discovery through learning
by doing, aims to develop students' emotional relationship with nature, their attention to
ecological issues and social relations, and encourages them in this field (e.g., Ballantyne &
Packer, 2002).
Children's rights violations caused by environmental damage can have lifelong, irreversible,
and even intergenerational consequences. Therefore, the UNCRC provides a strong normative
framework for the realization of children's rights through a healthy environment. Children,
parents and adults working with children should be familiar with the international framework
of children's rights and should be encouraged to receive an education that respects the natural
environment and raises their awareness (Blanchet-Cohen & Elliot 2011). Here, rights based,
child friendly education systems and schools come into play; these schools are characterized
as a child-friendly schools, inclusive, healthy and protective for all children, impactful,
emotionally safe, and relevant to families, communities and children and are covered in the
UNICEF Framework. Therefore, this study explores in-depth and broadly links and synergies
between environmental education, the SDGs, the UNCRC and the CFS from a critical
perspective.
Outcome of Environmental Education
Environmental education comprises ecological and environmental learning, nature awareness,
forest pedagogics and other terms (O’Flaherty & Liddy, 2018; Rauch, 2000; Weiss &
Rametsteiner, 2005). Environmental education is a significant educational mission and field
for every institution at every stage of education. Based on environmental education, it is
understood that human life includes the biological life in the world and that individuals are in
harmony with this biological life and nature, and by raising understanding of this from early
childhood, protecting the environment will facilitate the life of future generations (Kharrazi,
Kudo & Allasiw, 2018; Sinakou, Boeve-de Pauw, & Van Petegem, 2019). This education aims
to increase self-confidence and responsibility in individuals, increases environmental
awareness and individuals’ conscious of the environment (Liu & Guo, 2018; Erhabor, 2018).
Environmental education includes a number of components such as awareness, knowledge and
attitudes towards environmental threats, the skills to identify them and the ability to find
solutions to environmental problems, as well as participation in activities that lead to their
resolution (Ramadhan, Sukma & Indriyani, 2019; Law, Hills & Hau, 2017). Additionally, this
education improves their problem-solving and decision-making skills by providing individuals
with the ability to look at a subject from different perspectives through critical thinking (EPA,
2007).
Environmental education has had many positive effects, from improving academic
performance to personal growth and the development of critical life skills such as confidence,
leadership and autonomy (Chen, 2018; Browning & Rigolon, 2019; Ramadhan, Sukma &
Indriyani, 2019). Bodzin et al. (2010) state that being in a relationship with the environment
and exposure to environmental education, individuals can improve their academic development
by strengthening scientific inquiry, arithmetic and developing language arts through writing
and speaking. There are studies showing that environmental education increases civic
participation and positive environmental behaviours. For example, Powell et al. (2011)
assessed a middle school-focused residential outdoor program that emphasized character
development and environmental education. The study discusses the links between
environmental education and positive youth development in light of the findings on character
development, environmental responsibility and leadership. Stevenson et al. (2013) also discuss
how environmental education goes beyond mere understanding and conceptualization. They
state how it goes to develop learner agency, including a problem-solving orientation. Through
focus groups and surveys with environmental education participants and practitioners, West
(2015) identified numerous and varied outcomes for both groups, with an emphasis on
knowledge as well as social outcomes among participants. Researchers who have closely
examined some environmental education programs have found that environmental programs
involve providing individuals with environmental awareness, attitudes, skills, intentions,
enjoyment, and behaviours that include citizen participation (Ardoin et al., 2020; Stern et al.,
2014; Ladwig, 2010). Environmental education, which provides individuals with attitudes,
values, knowledge and skills to take environmentally friendly actions, encourages individuals
to improve the sustainability of human-nature interactions over time (Mastr ́angelo et al., 2019;
UNESCO, 1978).
Environmental Education for Sustainable Development
The ideologies of environmental education contained in the Tbilisi Declaration include the
basic values of sustainable development: adopting perspectives both at the local and global
level; promotion of international solidarity; considering the social aspects of the environment
and the close links between economy, environment and development (UNESCO, 1978).
Sustainable development is the overarching framework of the United Nations and this
framework has four dimensions, which are society, environment, culture and economy (WHO,
2016). These dimensions are not separate from each other but are intertwined. Sustainability is
a paradigm in which social, environmental and economic issues are balanced in search of a
better quality of life that includes future goals (Schaltegger & Wagner, 2017; Epstein,
Elkington & Herman, 2018). For example, a prosperous society provides food and resources
and relies on a healthy environment, aiming to provide its citizens with safe drinking water and
clean air.
The 2030 Agenda consists of seventeen Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169
targets that will guide policy and finance for the next nine years (United Nations, 2015a). This
Agenda includes acting in collaborative partnership with all countries and stakeholders, from
ending poverty, reducing inequality, to building more peaceful, wealthy societies by 2030.
These targets and objectives are “global in nature and universally applicable, taking into
account different national realities, capacities and levels of development and respecting
national policies and priorities” (Matte et al., 2015, p.6). The UN 2030 Sustainable
Development Agenda envisions inclusive equality, justice and well-being within the
environmental framework and places a significant emphasis on education as set out in Goal 4.
Education is recognized as an aim for education in Goal 4.7 with sustainability as a means to
accomplish the remaining 16 Goals.
Target 4.7 “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to
promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable
development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture
of peace and nonviolence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of
culture’s contribution to sustainable development” (UNESCO, 2019, p.68).
Education and environmental sustainability are not only closely related to each other, but also
strongly linked by a cause-effect relationship; therefore, what is typically caused by the former
naturally affects the latter (Howe, 2009; Walid & Luetz, 2018). In this categorisation,
education assists as a tool to achieve environmental sustainability goals. Although in theory
this seems like a reasonable and logical conclusion, in practice it turns out to be a much more
unstable relationship network. After exploring the broader historical relationships between
environmental education and Environmental Sustainability and Sustainable Development, the
SDGs show the story of a worsening relationship between education and the environment.
Within the SDGs, education is included in Goal 4: “Ensure inclusive and equitable quality
education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all” (United Nations, 2021, p.11).
While this goal deals with development from a social and economic point of view in its main
statement, it does not make any special reference to the environment. In other words,
sustainable development (SD) seeks to grasp and explain the relationship between society and
economy to promote the transition to sustainability. However, environment was not mentioned
in this SDG statement on education. The complexity of sustainability as a concept makes it
challenging and ambiguous making it difficult to relate SDGs to educational learning outcomes
with what Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) endeavours to achieve. While the
multiple targets detail individual targets, SDG Goal 4 does not address environmental
sustainability and does not make a single explicit reference. This raises several important
questions and the most important is; if environmental sustainability is not even a target, can
education be expected to deliver results in environmental sustainability? In other words, can
education achieve its real purpose related to the environment without including sustainability?
Sustainable Development Goals cannot be fulfilled without addressing children's rights (United
Nations, 2015a, 2021). It covers and applies to children, even if not explicitly stated in all goals
and targets of the 2030 Agenda. Therefore, it is essential that the implementation of the 2030
Agenda promote, strengthen, protect, and fulfil the realization of children's rights by integrating
a children's rights-based approach that respects and promotes children's rights (Arts, 2019).
Using both main structures in synergy will strengthen their mutual practices and ensure that
children's rights are realized in a meaningful way. All world leaders strive to fulfil their 2030
commitment, striving to secure healthy and quality education, a clean world and more for
children all over the world (United Nations, 2021). More than 100 Member States have
reconsidered their promises to children's rights to ensure the implementation of the SDGs
(United Nations, 2021). UNICEF collaborates with governments, other UN agencies and
partners to help countries guarantee that the SDGs deliver equal results for and with every
child, for present and future generations. On a national basis, some countries have explicitly
embraced the right of the child to participate in their constitutions and domestic laws (Parkes,
2015). In many court decisions, UNCRC and regional documents, the child's right to
participation is clearly cited and discussed (Geary, 2012). Considering the processes and
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.