279x Filetype PPTX File size 1.15 MB Source: pmg.org.za
INTRODUCTION: STRATEGIC
CONTEXT
1. Castle Control Board (CBB) Mandate 3. Alignment with national policy
from Castle Management Act (1993) and strategic imperatives
and other relevant Legislation
2. Four (4) strategic objectives: 4. The CCB manages the Castle on
an enterprise-risk
basis/partnerships
Good Corporate Governance and
Administration
Develop the museum and interpretative 5. A regular, diligent process of
heritage components risk assessment, risk register and
Develop and promote the Castle as a mitigation i.e. going concern,
heritage tourism destination revenue, safety & security, human
Ensure broad, public accessibility
resource management
HIGHLIGHTS AND CHALLENGES
The Clean Audit opinion from the AGSA Renovations, 350 Commemoration and
A hugely successful 350 commemoration tourism: with the help of the MOD&MV – we
programme managed this!
Massive increase in publicity (559 million audience) Tourism revenue decrease (R3.9 vs APP target
Highest recorded visitor totals in the history of the of R4.2 million) – new restaurant, kiosk, gift
Castle (195 445) shops, increase in events and increase in
entrance fees (1 Oct. 2017) mitigate this risk
Expansion tangible heritage offerings (Centre for
Memory, Healing & Learning, Four King’s statues, Utilization of the Surplus and its effect on
Restitution Garden, Schools Legacy Project Mural, operations (Log Support of R3m mitigates this)
Wall, & Virtual Tour) Lack of a one precinct-one management
Savings on our maintenance budget system (ongoing)
Very pro-active, well-trained and managed staff Security and SANDF guards (Colonel Feni
component deployed a Major to oversee the troops)
With the exception of one (1) KPI, we met or
The R1.7 over-expenditure for 350-
exceeded all 17 other. This during in an commemoration (although approved) –
exceptionally busy, challenging year
engaged Treasury
SUMMARY OF ACTUAL PERFORMANCE
AGAINST (2016/17 APP TARGETS)
PERFORMANCE NUMBE UNDER/OVER MITIGATION
AREA R OF
KPI’S
Administration and 4 All 4 on target (over expenditure of As revenues improve
Good Corporate R1.3 on personnel the personnel cost:
Governance operations will
improve
Preservation, 4 All 4 on target N/A
interpretation and
showcasing of the
Castle’s History
Maximizing Tourism 6 One (1) not met (tourism revenue) Revenue optimization
potential plan is activated
Increase public access 4 All 4 on target N/A
and perception
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
(2016/17 BUDGET)
Programme/acti 2015/2016 2016/2017
vity/ Budget Actual (Over)/Under Budget Actual (Over)/Und
objective Expenditure Expenditure Expenditure er
Expenditur
e
R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000 R’000
Administration 5 091 5 658 (567) 6 637 8 010 (1 373)
through
corporate
governance
Preservation 1 950 282 1668 369 260 109
and protection
of military and
cultural
heritage
Maximising the 130 10 120 41 30 11
Castle’s
tourism
potential
Increased 1476 (1 146) 1 167 1 640 (473)
public profile 330
and positive
perception of
the Castle
TOTAL 7 501 7 426 75 8 214 9 940 (1 726)
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.