232x Filetype PPT File size 0.18 MB Source: www.grips.ac.jp
Key Relations
Leadership
Critical role of top leaders (cannot be out-
sourced!)
Providing development vision
Organizing technocratic teams
Affecting how the system works
Different types of leadership: political, economic
and developmental, etc.
Issues
Sustainability of “good” (=strong & effective)
leaders?; succession problems
Personal leadership vs. organizational leadership?
Types of Leadership and
Technocrat Teams
Leadership Type Technocrat Teams
Japan Organizational MOF, EPA, MITI (super-ministry
(Late 50s-70s) leadership for industrial policy)
S. Korea Strong personal EPB (super-ministry), headed
(60s-70s) leadership by Deputy PM; reporting
directly to the President
Malaysia Strong personal Prime Minister’s Dept. esp.,
(80s-90s) leadership EPU (super-ministry) & ICU
Thailand (80s) Organizational Four macro core agencies (no
leadership super-ministry); but, weak
macro-sector links
Technocrats (Central
Admin.)
Developmental coalition btw. leaders and
technocrats is crucial (b/c leaders alone cannot
design & implement policies)
Serving as a strategic core center of development
management (not just donor management)
Issues
The stability of professional civil services often
threatened
Political interference in civil service appointments;
technocrats are held “hostages” by political leaders.
Weak inter-agency coordination (within central
admin., central-local admin., private sector, etc.)
Problems of monitoring & evaluation
Technocrats (Central
Admin.)
Limitation in the quality and flow of information,
preventing the govt. from making right policy
decisions.
Establishing formal systems & rules does not
guarantee their effective functions.
Problems of corruption
Capacity constraints: dilemma btw. what should
be done (multitude of development challenges)
and what can be done (govt. capacity
constraints); need for prioritization
Limited bargaining power against donors;
sometimes, donor-driven policy and aid decision
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.