320x Filetype PPT File size 0.53 MB Source: www.acadinnet.com
Classical mechanics
_________________________________________
A perplexing aspect of quantum mechanics is that it defies an intuitive
understanding. It is so different from classical physics as built by Newton,
Maxwell, and Einstein. Laws of classical physics are deterministic in the
sense that given, say, Newton’s laws of motion, and initial conditions
(position and momentum) at some instant t = 0 for a system and a time
history of the force(s) acting on the system, we can, in principle, accurately
predict the state of that system at any time in the past or the future. In
principle, at least, we can measure the state of the system (position and
momentum) without disturbing it.
2
Quantum mechanics
_________________________________________
In quantum mechanics, the situation is completely different. The counter-
part of Newton’s laws of motion for a quantum system is the Schrödinger’s
equation, and the state of the system is described by something called the
“wave function”,, which no one understands intuitively. It is so abstract
that we understand it only in a mathematical sense.
It has not been possible for physicists (or anyone else for that matter) to
understand the wave function in any other way. If we try to measure the
state of a quantum system, hell breaks loose; we have no way of deter-
ministically predicting what the result of a measurement will be! And ,
even in principle, there is no way we can measure a quantum system
without disturbing it. That is why physics is divided into two parts:
classical physics, and quantum physics.
3
Quantum measurement is a mystery
_________________________________________
No one knows what transitory changes a quantum system undergoes when
it is measured. We do know, however, that while we cannot make a
deterministic prediction of the result of a measurement, we can make an
amazingly accurate probabilistic prediction of it. I and a former student of
mine, Vikram Menon, have come up with a hypothesis to explain this very
unusual aspect of quantum systems. You can look up our paper at arXiv:
Bera, R.K., and Menon, V., A new interpretation of superposition, entanglement, and measurement in
quantum mechanics, arXiv:0908.0957v1 [quant-ph], 07 August 2009, at http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0957.
The probabilistic aspect of quantum mechanics is intriguing because
Schrödinger’s equation has no built in probabilities; indeed it produces only
deterministic results! So where did the probabilities come in?
4
Measurement is probabilistic
_________________________________________
The probabilities came in because a bunch of physicists, sometime in the 1920s,
said so! (This became known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum
mechanics.) They looked at available experimental data, and they found that the
results of measurements carried out on quantum systems follow an unusual
probabilistic pattern.
Just as Isaac Newton observed that material things are gravitationally attracted to
each other (but only “God” knows why) and stated it as a fundamental law of
nature, so did Max Born* state this probabilistic aspect of quantum systems as a law
of quantum mechanics.
It is extremely important to note that laws of nature are like the man-made axioms
in mathematics. We do not know (and can never know) why the laws are as they
are. Only “God” can enlighten you. We can only marvel at the intellectual genius of
those physicists who are able to read the mind of “God”.
*Born shared the Nobel Prize in Physics, 1954 (with Walther Bothe) “for his fundamental research in
quantum mechanics, especially for his statistical interpretation of the wavefunction”.
5
Axioms of quantum mechanics
_________________________________________
Here are the laws (or postulates or axioms) of quantum mechanics stated informally.
Quantum mechanics describes a physical system through a mathematical
object called the state vector (or the wave-function) |. | is complex (i.e., it
has real and imaginary parts) and a vector of unit length.
| evolves in a deterministic manner according to the linear Schrödinger
equation:
2
2
Vi
2m t
2
where is the wave function, is the reduced Planck's constant, is the
Laplacian operator that describes how the wave function changes from one place
to another, V describes the forces acting on the particle, m is the mass of the particle
being described, and t describes how the wave function changes its shape with time.
| remains a unit vector during its evolution, only its orientation changes.
6
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.