347x Filetype PPT File size 0.47 MB Source: www.extension.iastate.edu
Objectives
Objectives
Identify potential benchmark measures
of cost/benefit of quality management
system adoption by agriculture.
Set scope of the project
Select summarizing fiscal indicator of
costs and benefits measures
Dual Roles for ISO 9000/9004
Dual Roles for ISO 9000/9004
QMS for fulfilling customer, regulatory,
etc., requirements (ISO 9000)
“Management should consider
development of innovative financial
methods to support and encourage
improvement of the organizational
performance” (ISO 9004 – Guidelines
for performance improvements)
Allocation of Costs: Process Approach
Allocation of Costs: Process Approach
Early methods of tracking quality costs
was too limited “focus on cost of non-
conformance i.e. external and internal
failure costs”. (Juran)
Process-cost broadens economics of
quality by classifying cost of non-
conformance and cost of conformance
I.e. “costs incurred when a process is
running without failure” (Schottmiller)
Process Approach: Added Benefits
Process Approach: Added Benefits
Utilize cost of non-conformance (often
called Cost of Poor Quality) and cost of
conformance = greater cost saving
opportunities may be available in
reducing cost of conformance (Schottmiller)
Process Costing
Process Costing
Allows the tracking and reduction of costs
normally associated with efficiency in
addition to effectiveness (quality)” (Schottmiller)
Process simplification in addition to
reduction of errors become objectives
(Schottmiller)
Relate the economics of quality to the
amount of activity performed (ISO/TR 10014: Economics of
Quality)
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.