385x Filetype PPT File size 0.16 MB Source: www.oecd.org
Issues for debate
• Implications of the use of evaluation as
a management tool
• Changing evaluation "objects".
–systems and policies,
–programmes,
–research 'collectives',
–individuals and
–institutions.
Evaluation as a management tool
• Characterizing evaluation activities
- objects
- aims
- approaches
- articulation with decision making processes
• Different objects (Chabbal's terminology (1987))
– Actors: individuals & research collectives,
– Operators: institutions, procedures, programmes and agencies/services,
Policies
Evaluation objects: changing focus
• From the beginning: actors at the core of the process
Researchers and research teams, research results and
projects
Organizing the Peer review process
• OECD and the evaluation of national systems
Peer reviews and indicators
• The eighties and the focus on research operators
Programmes at the core of new methodological
developments
• The nineties (1) and the fashion of privatisation
Focusing on the performance of research institutions
• The nineties (2) up to … : the fashion of 'excellence'
and the growing between multiple missions and one sided
criteria of performance
Evaluation as a management tool
• Different aims
1- Audits
Objective: compliance to pre-established rules, often administrative.
Main effect: sanctions.
2- Assessment of Performance
Problems: measures, differentiating outputs from outcomes.
Approaches: "Summative"/"ex-post".
Effects: hierarchy/positioning, gratifications/ rewards.
3- Relevance of action/activities
Objective: the adequate "implementation structures".
Approach: "pro-active" (focusing on the definition of future action).
Effects: changes/adaptations in the course of action
4- Appropriateness (overall strategy)
Objective: discussing the aims (against the changing environment)
and/or their translation into goals and objectives.
Effects: redefinition of the action and of its course.
Evaluation as a management tool
• Approaches to evaluation
- evaluation process versus tools mobilized
- "characterization" (of a situation) versus "judgment"
- relations between approaches and couples "object/aim"
--> typical articulations
• The articulation with decision making processes
- 2 different approaches: support to the “boss” or as a means
for collective learning.
- 4 major constraints -->
- Timing ---> to feed back in the decision making process
- Relevance ---> to address issues at stake
- Robustness---> to resist critics from evaluees
- Credibility ---> to be taken up by stakeholders & decision makers
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.