317x Filetype PDF File size 0.29 MB Source: www.rilem.net
NSF/RILEM Workshop
In-Situ Evaluation of Historic Wood and Masonry Structures
(July 10-14, 2006 – Prague, Czech Republic)
Overview of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Methods of Materials Evaluation
Paul J. Tikalsky
Abstract 1. Introduction
The opening paper of this symposium was The evaluation of the materials of historic
dedicated to an overview of the existing state of structures is one of the most challenging aspects
the practice and the advantages and limitations of addressing the retrofit or restoration of the
of non-destructive testing methods for the historic functionality of bridges, buildings, and
evaluation of historic materials of construction. engineered structures. The challenges are not in
The methods discussed in this paper include the simply defining the general nature of the original
state of the practice in visual, rebound, materials used in the structure, but the specific
penetration, and ultrasound methods, as well as origin of the material and the transformation of
the physical measurement of cracks, that material over time to the present. This
displacements and other properties. The paper transformation may involve a chemical or
discusses some of existing developing practices physical transformation of the material from
in advancing technologies such as X-ray and years of environmental exposure, fatigue, one of
ground penetrating radar. more incidence or events of damage over the life
of the structure. The material may have been
transformed or affected by attempts to address
deficiencies or damage events by repair or
changes in the original design. Any of these
transformations change the material properties
or functionality of the existing structure.
The nature of historic structures further
complicates the determination of the historic
engineering properties and the engineering
properties that exist today and the future. In
these structures, maintaining the fabric of the
structural elements in its entirety is a major
priority. This often precludes the use of
destructive evaluation of elements to determine
the engineered properties or the testing of sub
assembles for macro properties.
Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) is a broad
category of evaluation techniques that allow
engineers to predict the existing engineering
properties of historic structures, materials, or
assemblies. Nondestructive testing (NDT) is the
examination of an object with technology that
Paul J. Tikalsky, Ph.D., P.E., FACI; Chair and Professor does not substantially affect the object's future
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering usefulness. The methods can be as direct as
University of Utah visual inspection or as indirect as ultrasound or
31
NSF/RILEM Workshop
In-Situ Evaluation of Historic Wood and Masonry Structures
(July 10-14, 2006 – Prague, Czech Republic)
penetrating radar signal response. NDE includes These tests generally provide comparative
methods that can detect internal and external information to differentiate between acceptable
imperfections; determine structure, composition, materials to those that are not acceptable.
and material properties and measure geometric
characteristics of elements and deteriorated 2.1 Visual Techniques
assemblies. This introductory paper presents the
basic technologies by which the workshop Visual surveys of historic structures and
launches its more detailed discussions on materials are critical to any rapid and
advancing technologies. comprehensive investigation. Visual surveys of
structures are typically used to identify cracks,
There are five major uses for NDT in the distortions, discolorations, serviceability issues,
consideration of historic structures: signs of chemical deterioration, physical
damage, or distress and evidence of functional
-assessing and documenting the existing issues.
condition of a building or structure; Cracks and distortions are often symptoms
-in-situ evaluation of materials, structural of more complicated issues. Settlement,
elements and sub-assemblies; structural distress, chemical deterioration,
-determination of the quality of existing material fatigue, overloads, and many other problems are
of the extent of the damage; indicated by cracks and distortions. The crack
-quality assurance during the reconstruction of patterns, width, movement, and growth can be
historic buildings; and coupled with structural distortions to help
-determination of Physical Properties of existing understand the causes of multiple issues in
materials for use in design, restoration or historic structures. Cracks in concrete,
rehabilitation. limestone and some other stones can be roughly
aged by petrographic techniques looking at the
While these five are not the only reasons to use extent of oxidation and carbonation.
NDE, they are the most prevalent reasons and
key reasons to undertake NDE programs in any
historic restoration.
2 Basic Techniques of NDE
There are both basic and advanced levels of
NDE. The most basic technologies are widely
available and involve technicians collecting data
(non-destructive testing, NDT) from several
focused methods and engineers evaluating the
collected data to determine the required
properties or information, i.e. non-destructive
evaluation (NDE). Figure 1 Crack microscope
Basic level NDE are techniques that are
widely available through local testing Cracks should be mapped in as much detail as
laboratories and require only a knowledgeable possible. The width of cracks can be determined
technician to execute the test. They are based on by simple crack comparators or a crack
empirical relationships with a relatively wide microscope, like that showed in Figure 1.
range of accuracy and resolution. Most basic The movement of cracks can be determined
technologies require some reference by which by surface mounted reference gages that are
results are compared or measured against. periodically measured by a manual strain gage.
The movements can also be continuously
32
NSF/RILEM Workshop
In-Situ Evaluation of Historic Wood and Masonry Structures
(July 10-14, 2006 – Prague, Czech Republic)
monitored by arrays of transducers like those
shown in Figure 2.
Other visual methods can identify the
discolorations and laitance on materials. These
can be used to determine the type of
deterioration so that it can be abated and avoided
in the future.
Figure 3 Schmidt Hammer
A different type of rebound method is the chain
method. This rebound technique used an
audible acoustic response to determine identify
distressed areas or delaminations in stone or
concrete flat work. The chain instruments can
be heavy single chain strands or multiple chains
of the same length and a common handle, as
shown in Figure 4. The chain resonates as it is
dragged along the structural element. High pitch
sounds are associated with dense, defect free
Figure 2 Crack movement array materials. The pitch of the response becomes
lower with delaminations or defects near the
2.2 Basic Rebound Methods surface.
Rebound methods are founded in basic elastic
theory. As hardened objects impact many types
of building materials, there is a rebound
response that is a function of the dynamic
modulus and the damping properties of the
material. In some cases, the response is
measured as a direct measurement of the
rebound. In other cases, the response may be an Figure 4 Multiple chain drag instrument
acoustic or frequency response.
The “Schmidt Hammer” is an example of A third type of rebound instrument is the
the direct rebound response. A typical Schmidt rebound hammer. Hammers between 0.5 and
Hammer is shown in Figure 3. This instrument 2.5 kg are typically used in structural evaluation
is not a highly accurate NDE instrument, but can of historic structures. Heavier hammers are
be effective is comparing different locations of sometime used with thick stonework, soils, and
the same materials. The Schmidt Hammer mass structures. The hammers typically have
requires large numbers of samples and it is higher frequencies than chains. They can be
subject to a variety of factors that can affect the electronically monitored or acoustically
results. The orientation of the instrument, the measured.
surface texture, element size, moisture content,
carbonation, and operator all play a role in the 2.3 Pull-out methods
response of the instrument.
Pull-out methods involve embedding probes in
construction materials to determine the
mechanical properties of in-situ materials. In
some test procedures, the energy needed to
embed the probe is indirectly measured to
33
NSF/RILEM Workshop
In-Situ Evaluation of Historic Wood and Masonry Structures
(July 10-14, 2006 – Prague, Czech Republic)
determine the relative strength of the material. frequency is determined by the nature of the
The Windsor Probe uses a fixed powder charge material that is being evaluated. A second type
to project a probe into stone, masonry, or of ultrasound technique is based on the response
concrete. The depth of penetration can be of a small impact hammer. Is something that
calibrated to relative strength. The Windsor combines rebound methods and ultrasound,
Probe method is not a precise method and it is “Impact Echo” ultrasound uses a small hammer
subject to variation from the hardness of the to impart a vibration in a structural member.
stone and the level of carbonation. The vibration is then picked up with an
Other pull-out methods use inserts that are ultrasound transducer or receiver. The
withdrawn with hydraulic rams. The energy of evaluation of the waveform can be conducted to
withdrawal is measured to determine the relative determine the frequency of the echoed response
strength of the material. and the time for the return wave, as shown in
Pull-out methods are not purely non- Figure 5.
destructive methods, in that they cause localized
loss of native materials. For this reason, they are
not typically used for historic structures or
materials.
3 Advanced Techniques of NDE
Advanced level NDE techniques generally use
greater electronic sophistication or advanced
knowledge or chemistry or physics theory. The
instruments need advanced level training or
experience to develop a proficiency at the
execution of the test and to interpret the real
time results. The real time interpretation of data
is important in many advance level NDE
techniques because adjustments are needed to
position probes or the location of other tests. Figure 5 Impact echo method. (Impact Echo
The advanced techniques are typically used Instruments, LLC)
on specialized structures and not on as routinely
as more basic methods. This means that the
database of comparable data is limited and the 3.2 Conductivity Methods
data to support accuracy or reliability are also
limited. Many of these techniques are more The electrical conductive of construction
fully developed in other papers in this workshop materials can be correlated to a variety of
proceedings. engineered properties. These techniques utilize
Ohm’s Law, correlating resistance to voltage
3.1 Ultrasound Evaluation and current. The most common of these
methods is a moisture meter. Conductivity
Ultrasound may be the simplest of the advanced moisture meters correlate the electrical
techniques of NDE. It is based on the theory resistivity and electrical conductivity.
that energy waves are transmitted through solids Generally, the greater the moisture in porous
as a function of both elastic properties and materials the greater the conductivity of the
density. Ultrasound is often used to identify material.
internal defects, density changes, crack depths, Electrical conductivity meters can also be
and delaminations. used to evaluate the permeability of construction
The most common type of ultrasound uses a materials. Four probe arrays can be used to
transmitter and a receiver array. The transmitter evaluate the conductivity of porous building
34
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.