347x Filetype PDF File size 0.40 MB Source: eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
This is a repository copy of What is sustainable fashion?.
White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:
http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99507/
Version: Accepted Version
Article:
Henninger, C.E., Alevizou, P.J. and Oates, C.J. orcid.org/0000-0001-8848-9178 (2016)
What is sustainable fashion? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. ISSN
1361-2026
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2015-0052
Reuse
Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright
exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy
solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The
publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White
Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder,
users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website.
Takedown
If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by
emailing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
eprints@whiterose.ac.uk
https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
For Peer Review
!"# $
%
&
%'()
(%*
#
Page 1 of 22 Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
1
2
3 What is sustainable fashion?
4
5 Abstract
6
7 Purpose Ð The purpose of this paper is to examine what the term sustainable fashion
8 means from the perspective of micro-organisations, experts, and consumers.
9 Design/methodology/approach Ð This research is qualitative in nature, utilising a
10 multi-methods case study approach (semi-structured interviews, semiotics,
11 questionnaires). Grounded analysis was applied to analyse the data.
12 Findings Ð Findings indicate that interpretation of sustainable fashion is context and
13
14 person dependent. A matrix of key criteria provides the opportunity to find common
15 elements.
16 Research limitations/implications Ð Due to the nature of this research the sample
17 size is limited and may not be generalised. Data were collected in the UK and are
18 limited to a geographical region.
19
20 For Peer Review
Practical implications Ð An important implication is that defining sustainable
21 fashion is vital in order to avoid challenges, such as greenwashing, which were faced
22 in other industries that have a longer history in sustainable practices. Micro-
23 organisations should take advantage of identifying key sustainable fashion criteria,
24 which will enable them to promote their fashion collections more effectively.
25 Social implications Ð The criteria identified provide assurance for consumers that
26
27 sustainable fashion is produced with social aspects in mind (fair wages, good working
28 conditions).
29 Originality/value Ð The paper proposes a matrix that allows micro-organisations to
30 clearly identify their collections as sustainable.
31 Keywords Ð sustainable fashion, micro-organisation, sustainability, fashion,
32
33 sustainable fashion criteria, UK, case study research
34 Paper type Ð Research paper
35
36
37 1. Introduction
38
39 The second anniversary of the Rana Plaza factory incident marks an increased interest
40
41 in sustainable fashion and ethical practices in the industry (Westervelt 2015). With
42
43 sustainability emerging as a ÔmegatrendÕ (Mittelstaedt et al 2014) the fashion
44
45 landscape changes dramatically, whereby sustainable fashion becomes increasingly
46 mainstream (Watson & Yan 2013; Mora et al 2014). Extant research predominantly
47
48 focused on sustainable fashion consumption (e.g. Joy et al 2012; Cao et al 2014)
49
50 rather than on establishing an academic understanding towards sustainable fashion,
51
52 which is part of the slow fashion movement (Jung & Jin 2014). This article utilises a
53 social constructionist approach to address this gap.
54
55 Sustainable fashion is part of the slow fashion movement, developed over the
56
57 past decades, and used interchangeably with eco-, green-, and ethical-fashion (Carey
58
59 & Cervellon 2014). Sustainable fashion first emerged in the 1960s, when consumers
60 became aware of the impact clothing manufacturing had on the environment and
1
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management Page 2 of 22
1
2
3 demanded the industry change its practices (Jung & Jin 2014). Although eco-fashion
4
5 was negatively perceived at first this changed with anti-fur campaigns emerging in the
6
7 1980s/90s, followed by an interest in ethical clothing in the late 1990s. Ethical fashion
8 is associated with fair working conditions, a sustainable business model (Joergens
9
10 2006), organic and environmentally friendly materials (Johnston 2012), certifications,
11
12 and traceability (Henninger 2015).
13
14 Sustainable fashion as part of the slow fashion movement is often
15 misleadingly described as the opposite of fast fashion. Slow fashion is based on a
16
17 philosophical ideal that centres on sustainability values, such as good working
18
19 conditions and reducing environmental destruction (e.g. Bourland 2011;
20 For Peer Review
21 Pookulangara & Shephard 2013). It challenges the fast fashion paradigm by breaking
22
23 down existing boundaries between the organisation and its stakeholders, slowing the
24 production process to a more manageable timeframe, moving away from the self-
25
26 concept, and focusing on empowering workers by offering a choice that enables
27
28 change (Clark 2008). According to ÔThe True CostÕ movie (2015) sustainable fashion
29
30 is more than a simple fad, but rather considers the social, natural, and economic
31 ÔpriceÕ paid in fashion production. Yet uncertainty remains around what the term
32
33 Ôsustainable fashionÕ entails and what might be the guidelines for producing
34
35 sustainable garments (Watson & Yan 2013; The True Cost 2015).
36
37 The slow fashion movement and sustainable fashion are increasing in
38
39 importance (Battaglia et al 2014), yet consumer awareness remains low (Gonzalez
40 2015). Past research on sustainable fashion focused on consumersÕ perceptions and
41
42 attitudes (Goworek et al 2013; Shen et al 2013; McNeill & Moore 2015), and its
43
44 impact on consumer purchasing behaviour (Shen et al 2013). Although research has
45
46 investigated aspects of sustainable fashion, current studies lack an academic
47 understanding of what sustainable fashion is from a holistic perspective. This article
48
49 contributes to literature by investigating two research questions from a social
50
51 constructionist point of view:
52
53 1) What are the underlying principles of sustainable fashion from the point of view
54 of micro-organisations, experts, and consumers?
55 2) How is the concept of sustainable fashion related to aspects of social
56 constructionism?
57
58
59 Understanding underlying principles of sustainable fashion is vital, in order to avoid
60
negative connotations such as greenwashing (e.g. Rahman et al 2014). Theoretical
2
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.