345x Filetype PDF File size 1.58 MB Source: www.judiciary.uk
The Crown Court Compendium
……………………………..
Part II: Sentencing
August 2021
Originally written by:
Maddison – Ormerod – Tonking – Wait
Edited by:
Picton – Cooper – Harris
Crown Court Compendium Part II August 2021
Introduction
The first version of this Sentencing Compendium was published in May 2016. It was
written by Sir David Maddison, His Honour Simon Tonking, His Honour John Wait
and Professor David Ormerod QC.
This latest iteration continues the process of substantially revising and updating that
original version. HHJ Jonathan Cooper and Dr Lyndon Harris have taken the lead in
carrying out a substantial revision of much of the content working closely with HHJ
Martin Picton (lead editor).
On this occasion we are enormously indebted to Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth
(Newcastle University) and Kate Aubrey-Johnson (Barrister, Garden Court
Chambers) both for their textual suggestions addressing sentencing children as well
as for Appendix II, which they produced with assistance from Clare Parkinson
(Consultant Speech and Language Therapist). The Appendix draws on research
conducted by Kathryn Hollingsworth and Helen Stalford (‘“This is a case about you and
your future”: Towards Judgments for Children’ (2020) 83(5) Modern Law Review 1030-1058)
and additional research carried out by Professor Hollingsworth based on interviews
with justice-experienced children and young people (‘Sentencing Remarks for Children:
A New Approach’ Newcastle Law School Research Briefing No 14). Thanks are also owed
to the children who were interviewed for that research.
We consider that Part II has been greatly enhanced by the introduction of a specific
focus upon addressing the technical and language challenges of sentencing
children. We hope that judges will benefit from the learning provided on this topic
and not just when crafting sentencing remarks for children but by way of improving
the clarity of sentencing remarks generally.
Part II of the Compendium reflects the structure of the Sentencing Code in a way
that it is hoped users of this work will find helpful. The Sentencing Compendium is
not a text book that is intended might be read from cover to cover. It is a reference
work to which judges can turn as needed when dealing with discrete topics. For that
reason there is, in places, a degree of repetition. This is deliberate and is done in
order to avoid the user of the Compendium having to cross refer to other parts of the
book.
So far as the example sentencing remarks are concerned they should not be
considered as templates and neither should the adoption of them be regarded as a
guarantee against a successful appeal in respect of a sentence or a part of one. The
examples provide a starting off point should a judge find it helpful to have a form of
words to consider as part of the process of settling upon a way of expressing a
particular sentence or part of one. As with every aspect of the Compendium we are
keen to refine them with every reissue and input from practitioners is both welcomed
and encouraged.
Passing sentence is one of the most challenging parts of being a judge – not just
because of the many technical challenges (now happily somewhat reduced by
reason of the implementation of the Sentencing Code) but also because of the
importance attached to every word uttered by a judge on the part of all those directly
engaged with a particular case, and also the public at large. What we say and how
we say it is as important as the result itself, sometimes more so. Particular care is
needed when sentencing children and those that are otherwise vulnerable or face
Judicial College i
Crown Court Compendium Part II August 2021
challenges engaging meaningfully with the criminal justice system – hence the
inclusion of material provided by Professor Hollingsworth and Kate Aubrey-Johnson.
There are two papers written by Professor Hollingsworth that are hosted on the LMS
1
that are well worth reading .
What follows is a foreword from the Chairman of the Sentencing Council written for
the December 2020 revision but which is retained on this occasion as the content
remains relevant and useful.
HHJ Martin Picton, HHJ Jonathan Cooper and Lyndon Harris
31 August 2021
1
Sentencing Remarks for Children: Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth October 2019 and
Sentencing Remarks for Children and Young People: Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth
2020.
Judicial College ii
Crown Court Compendium Part II August 2021
Foreword (to the 2020 edition) by Lord Justice
Holroyde, Chairman of the Sentencing Council
I am told by the editors that Part II of this
Compendium has not previously had its own
foreword. I am therefore particularly pleased
to have been asked, as Chairman of the
Sentencing Council, to provide a foreword
for this latest revision. It gives me the
opportunity, which I gladly take, to welcome
the Sentencing Code. The outstanding work
– and stamina - of the Criminal Law team at
the Law Commission, under the leadership
of David Ormerod, has led to legislation
which will simplify and clarify sentencing procedure and will help make sentencing
more transparent to the public. Sentencing is a matter of constant, and increasing,
public concern, and the Code will benefit us all by making the procedural law more
accessible and easier to follow. We have been living in extraordinary times since the
last revision of this Part of the Compendium was published in December 2019. The
Code comes as very good news at the end of a most difficult year.
Old habits sometimes die hard, and we will all need to be vigilant, in the early
months of the Code, to avoid falling into the trap of referring to the old statutory
provisions instead of the new. This revision of the Compendium will help us to avoid
that trap, and it is therefore timely and welcome. We will also need to remember that
the Code applies to everyone convicted on or after 1 December 2020 but not to
those convicted before that date, even if they are sentenced later. It is very helpful to
have that single commencement date, but there will for a time be cases in which
judges and recorders are sentencing offenders to whom the old statutory provisions
apply. There will also, no doubt, be multi-handed cases in which one defendant has
pleaded guilty before 1 December but is not sentenced until others have been
convicted after that date, and the judge in those circumstances will need to refer to
both the old statutory provisions and the new. If an error is made, but only identified
by the court or the parties after the sentencing has been concluded, the power to
vary or rescind a sentence under section 385 of the Code (previously s155 of
PCC(S)A 2000) should where possible be used, in order to avoid an unnecessary
appeal.
The Code does not alter any of the sentencing guidelines. Nor does it alter the
general duty of the court to follow any relevant guideline unless satisfied that it would
be contrary to the interests of justice to do so: see sections 59 and 60 (previously
s125 of C&JA 2009).
2
The Sentencing Council launches a new website on 1 December. However, the
area housing the guidelines has not been changed, so any links which judges have
set up to the guidelines should continue to work. The guidelines themselves continue
to provide a link to this Compendium. The legislative references have been updated
to provide links to the Code, and the text has where necessary been updated to be
2
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/
Judicial College iii
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.